You can make a difference in changing high-stakes testing. Read
the National Resolution on High-Stakes Testing and click on the individual
button to sign.
Additional articles to support the resolution:
“I think if you talk to any
parent, educator, student and now you have fiscal administrators speaking out
all across the state, saying that we’ve gone way too far. We’re spending 45
days out of the school year preparing for benchmarks, drilling, and the whole
thing, for the test,” resident Mike Corwin said during citizen’s communication.
“I think there is a broad consensus that has come together to say we’ve
overstepped on this issue.”
The authors conclude that there is no convincing evidence
that the pressure
associated with high-stakes testing leads to any important
benefits for students’
achievement. They
call for a moratorium on policies that force the public education
system to rely on high-stakes testing.
In earlier posts, I
have advocated banning high-stakes testing as a means of making significant decisions about student
performance (achievement in a course, passing a course—end-of-year-tests,
being promoted, and graduating from high school). I suggested this
because the research evidence does not support continuing the practice in
American schools.
Do you have a comment on this
testing mania our students are enduring?